“We picked his school because it had a lift but he never uses it.Mallory has seen a big improvement in her relationship with her son.Ask for support from people who care about you and who will listen and empathize with your experience. Share your reactions, thoughts and how the experience impacted you. It often helps to speak with others who have shared your experience so you do not feel so different or alone. Your campus offers support services through its counselling centre. Keep in mind that your typical support system may be weakened if those who are close to you have also been impacted by the trauma. Remember that family and friends can be a major source of support during the recovery period. Ask other family members for help with parenting or other daily activities when you are upset or under stress. Don’t withdraw from seeking support just because you feel you might burden someone else. Most people do better after disasters with good support from others.
willow mulberry A Secured Investment
Since the onset of the recent global ?nancial recession, headlines relating to sukuk defaults by Kuwaiti ?rm The Investment Dar Company, the ?nancial difficulties surrounding Saudi conglomerates the Saad and Algosaibi Groups, and previous uncertainty around the repayment of sukuk by Dubai property developer Nakheel have led to uncertainty among investors and analysts alike. Especially in relation to the nature of a sukuk investment and, in particular, whether it is a secured investment, therefore raising questions as to what the ultimate recourse of investors would be in a default scenario.
The Treatment of Sukuk in a Default Scenario
In accordance with the Shariah, money itself has no intrinsic value and is merely a means to facilitate the exchange of assets. Since money itself has no value, there should be no charge for its use. Interest (riba) is therefore prohibited (haram). At the heart of sukuk transactions are therefore investments in assets which will generate a return, which is permitted (halal).
The presence of these assets has often led investors to believe that an investment in sukuk is a more ‘secure’ investment than an investment in conventional bonds. The reason for this is that many investors have believed that they will have either direct recourse or some form of security over the assets in the event of a default.
In the majority of unsecured sukuk transactions, although the investment is prima facie, also an indirect investment in assets, ultimately, the investors have no direct recourse to the assets themselves or any recourse is contractually restricted to selling the asset back to the obligor.
Therefore, the repayment of the investment is ultimately dependent on the exercise of a purchase undertaking by the obligor of the assets at maturity or upon the occurrence of a default. Thus, as with a conventional bond, the investors take credit risk on the obligor who has granted the purchase undertaking and will effectively rank as an unsecured creditor of such obligor. While typically, there is a physical asset in the structure, it is present primarily to generate periodic pro?t payments, not to enhance the credit quality of the deal or provide investors with recourse to the assets or security upon a default.
As a result, offering documents prepared for most sukuk transactions have very little disclosure (if any) in respect of the physical asset. Instead, disclosure focuses principally on the balance sheet, business and risks of the obligor.
As described above, the majority of asset based sukuk structures will be ultimately dependent upon the credit of the underlying obligor. In order to provide greater assurance to investors, some underlying obligors have previously also provided security to investors in order to ‘secure’ the sukuk. The previous sukuk transactions by Nakheel are examples of such structures.
It is important to understand the way in which security has generally been granted by obligors in asset based sukuk transactions. The obligor is typically not the issuer of the sukuk and therefore, no security is granted directly to investors in order to secure the obligations of the issuer under the certi?cates themselves.
The obligations of the obligor will be in favour of the issuer of the certi?cates, who will hold such obligations for the bene?t of the investors. The security is generally granted by the obligor in order to secure these obligations to the issuer under the transaction documents. To the extent that an obligor defaults under any of its payment obligations to the issuer, such as pursuant to the purchase undertaking, the security can generally be enforced against the obligor by or on behalf of the issuer to whom the obligation is owed. Any subsequent recoveries from the enforcement of the security will form part of the funds available to the issuer to repay the investors.
In addition, any security granted by an obligor under an asset based sukuk transaction is not necessarily related to the assets underpinning the Shariah structure in the relevant transaction; in many instances, the assets which form the basis of the security may be different assets to those which form part of the sukuk assets. Following a default by the obligor of its obligations under the transaction documents, the security may therefore be enforceable, but the investors may still not have any recourse to the sukuk assets themselves.
Taking True Asset Risk Asset Backed Sukuk Structures
There are, however,
Shariah compliant structures in existence for an investor who wishes to have exposure to asset risk and to have direct recourse to those assets as opposed to exposure to the credit risk of the particular obligor.
One conventional product that has attracted a great deal of attention over the last few years for its potential compatibility with Shariah principles has been asset backed securitisation. One of the cornerstones of the majority of conventional asset backed securitisation transactions is a true sale of assets. In order for the instruments ultimately evidencing an investment in an asset backed transaction to achieve the appropriate credit rating, the transfer or sale of assets needs to be a sale which would survive the insolvency of the original owner (such as the assets are isolated from the bankrupt estate of the originator). This is only achievable to the extent that the transfer represents a true transfer of ownership which is legally perfected. Many market commentators describe this type of structure as the next stage of evolution for Islamic ?nancial institutions, allowing ?nancial institutions to move assets off their balance sheets as their asset books continue to grow relative to their capital base.
The Sun Finance securitisation, a securitisation of proceeds derived from the sale of plots of land by Sorouh Real Estate on the Shams and Saraya Master developments in Abu Dhabi, was one of the few Shariah compliant sukuk to combine Shariah principles with asset backed securitisation. In this transaction, the desired credit rating on the instruments was achieved by ensuring that the credit analysis was dependent upon the performance of the pool of assets and not the corporate credit of the originator.
In order to achieve the true transfer of ownership, the relevant plots of land which were the subject of the securitisation were sold by the originator to a newly established limited liability company in Abu Dhabi and the sale of such land was legally perfected by registering the land in the name of that company at the Abu Dhabi Lands department. By perfecting the sale and structuring the transaction, such that investors had exposure to the direct sale proceeds of the land, the rating of the sukuk was based on asset performance rather than the originator’s credit worthiness.
The result is that the investors in the sukuk certi?cates have sole recourse to the securitised assets for the repayment of their investment. To the extent that the assets do not perform and generate insuf?cient pro?t, the investors do not receive the expected pro?t on their sukuk certi?cates. In this way, the transaction represents a fully asset backed, Shariah compliant, non recourse ?nancing. We have also discussed the fact that some asset based structures have been secured but that the security is granted by the obligor in order to secure its obligations under the transaction documents as opposed to security granted with respect to the payment obligations under the sukuk themselves.
Despite asset backed transactions such as the Sun Finance transaction having paved the way for other similar structures which remove the credit risk of the underlying originator, especially in the recent climate of increasing corporate defaults, investors appear less willing to take true asset risk in such structures and appear to remain desirous of investing in the corporate credit of an underlying obligor
with which they are familiar.
But equally, investors have also begun to demonstrate that they may be less willing to invest on the same unsecured basis or at least on the same commercial terms as they have previously done where they would be exposed purely to the credit risk of a particular underlying obligor. The answer for some investors may therefore be the sort of secured asset based structures discussed.
However, one additional alternative for such investors may be a hybrid structure which lies somewhere between the current unsecured asset based sukuk structures and true asset backed transactions. Such structures would provide investors with recourse to both the corporate credit of the obligor which they desire as well as to the assets themselves to the extent that the obligor fails to ful?l its obligations, making for a much safer investment as a result of the dual recourse.
There is certainly precedent for similar transactions in the conventional ‘covered bond’ industry. In covered bond transactions, investors have initial recourse to the corporate credit of the issuer of the covered bonds. However, to the extent that the issuer fails to ful?l its obligations, the investor will also have recourse to an earmarked pool of assets.
The percentage of cancer survivors has risen because we are doing a very good job of treating cancer. Our society is better educated about cancer screening, especially for breast, colon, and (more recently) lung cancers, so we are diagnosing many types of cancer earlier. We are able to administer better, often multiple, lines of therapy before cancers have reached advanced stages. We have also discovered markers for certain types of cancers (such as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer genes), which enables us to take more effective preventive measures. As a result, cancer survivors are living longer and often well into their senior years.CHICOPEE, Mass. (Mass Appeal) Day for a single guy or gal doesn have to be sad and lonely!Clinical psychologist Dr. Tim Hope shared tips to make this love struck holiday easier to cope with.The Parkway School District is trying to help by hosting a forum for parents and their children.A week ago, I decided to join him, and for the first time in nearly three years, that sense of joy and relief returned to me. I scored twice and hit the game winner. I was out of shape, so my body hurt and I was short of breath, but the stress had vaporized like water into hot air.